2015 Lillooet Lake Estates AGM
(January 28, 2015)
North Vancouver District Hall
355 West Queens Rd
North Vancouver BC
| 6:45 PM | Register for meeting – submit proxies etc. |
| 7:00 PM | Closed Public Meeting (no press)· BGC Engineer report re: Slide Risk /Mitigation Options – Report available at http://lillooetlakeestates.ca |
| 8:00 PM | 1) Call to Order of LLE AGM· Reports at http://lillooetlakeestates.ca/rcat/agms-special-meetings/2) Declaration of Quorum3) Introduction of 2014 Board of Directors |
| 8:05 PM | 4) Recess for 2015 Board Elections |
| 8:15 PM | 5) Receive report of 2015 Section Meeting Elections |
| 8:20 PM | 6) Approval of Minutes of 2014 AGM |
| 8:25 PM | 7) Reportsa)Treasurers Report – Mike Bjelos· Approval of Financial Statements for 2014· Approval of Proposed 2015 Budgeb) Public Works Committee Report – Robie Thornec) Fire and Safety – Daniel Jensen
d) Governance Committee – no report e) Presidents Report – Gary Young |
| Proposed Motion for LLE Owners to Consider:“that the owners endorse the guiding principles as a framework for the Board to work with government to find an acceptable solution to the risk and lead to the removal of the caution that has been issued by the SLRD” (see Principles attached to agenda) | |
| 8) Any New Business | |
| 9:30 PM | 9) Adjournment |
Principles to Guide Mitigation Work
- Mitigation of the risk is essential
- Achieving the 1:10,000 level or risk is essential.
- This is a problem that flows from Crown land – so it is a government responsibility to make right
- There should be no loss of lots as a result of the remediation steps
- The work must lead to protection for all shareholders
- If the work is a diversion to outside LLE, we cannot have any lots that do not meet the 1:10.000 standard
- The work must be done in a timely fashion
- The adopted mitigation strategy must ensure long term viability of the community
- The mitigation work should be at a level that ensure that the notice on title submitted by the SLRD can and will be removed
- Risk being equal, we should adopt the approach that has the least direct impact on natural beauty and community enjoyment of common property
- LLE has done nothing to create or contribute to this risk
- This is not an issue of blame, but an issue of taking responsibility
- The cost to repair lies with government
- The risk is not limited to LLE – also impacts on those using the FSR (e.g. FN, Hydro lines and logging companies)
The government is responsible for ongoing m2015 AGM Agenda
[wpmlunsubscribe]